Autotrader vs EBay
eBay has sold its 2.6% of Autotrader to confirm the end of the relationship the two companies have shared since the year 2000. Next month, Autotrader will launch its own vehicle auction service.
When I found Autotrader’s official statement about the launch of auctions, I was surprised to read this quote from Autotrader’s Chip Perry:
“Now consumers have the option to not only buy and sell their cars via classified advertising but also through our unique Auction-Style Listing product, which allows conditional, local market bidding – unlike anything currently in the industry.
Touting the uniqueness of a car auction online is odd to me. The more effective here message is “it is free.” No listing fee is a good idea, and I like the way they are pushing it. While Perry is correct that this blend of an auction and a free listing is one of a kind, (the same NYT article says) eBay is the most popular automotive website and Autotrader is the seventh.
Six months ago I explained why I think Google will soon become a serious competitor in automotive classifieds, and I also expect the Goo to continue free listings as most of their services are delivered free with a side of text advertisements.
Will Autotrader make a splash in the auction market with free listings? Can Google seize the market by placing their own car ad listings in search results before links to Autotrader? How did Speed Racer defeat the mammoth car?
Comments(1)
The hardest part of my job is to break some of the traditional thinking that dealers want to bring online. The car industry is traditional by nature; new flavors of the same cars arrive annually, dealerships are branded with family names, and the jingle-based commercial is a dealership classic. I will never forget the jingle that Century 3 Chevrolet of Pittsburgh uses in their commercials. Ever. Really, it has been more than 5 years since I have lived within their reach.
I prefer not to wrap text around a picture of a wheel. I do not think that drawing an ugly “burst” around words will make a message more effective. Instead, I very much like to guide the reader’s attention from the top left corner downward. I see no reason to disorganize a page to the degree that a message needs to jump out at the reader in order to grab their attention. Websites are advertisements, but to design them like ads severely dilutes their effectiveness.
Search engine marketing is not paid search. Why this is not obvious is beyond me. Marketing does not equal “buying ads,” so how could something something marketing mean buying ads on something something? I expect a trade publication to conduct the small amount of research required to ensure they are not fabricating definitions and misleading their readers.
His statement only makes sense after you have learned the bogus definition of SEM. I do not think that Mark is an idiot, and it is obvious (to me) that he is talking about pay-per-click advertising costs. It is unfortunate that he has been quoted saying something goofy like dealers are not trying to increase their traffic from search engines, but is that the worst part? I think the largest oops here is the fact that the writer of this article, Jim Leman, took his quote and multiplied the mistake, and none of the editors of the magazine knew better to sort it out. 








