Domain jamming with Network Solutions
Network Solutions has been one of the most expensive domain name registrars for a long time. I have only recently considered buying a domain name from them because GoDaddy does not yet offer the .us.com extension. The reason I do not give this company my money is simple: Network Solutions has ridiculous prices.
I quickly described a phenomenon that exploded this week in my last post. Network Solutions has started registering (not really) domains that customers search for on their website.
The company deployed a new security policy to hold for 4 days any domain that is searched at their website to prevent domain tasters from taking domains from potential customers after searches are completed but before names are purchased. The Domain Tools blog has detailed this process and what the domain default parked page looked like.
Public Relations to the rescue…
I’d like to clarify what we are doing. In response to customer concerns about Domain Name Front Running (domains being registered by someone else just after they have conducted a domain name search), we have implemented a security measure to protect our customers. The measure will kick in when a customer searches for an available domain name at our website, but decides not to purchase the name immediately after conducting the search.
After the search ends, we will put the domain name on reserve. During this reservation period, the name is not active and we do not monetize the traffic on these domains. If a customer searches for the domain again during the next 4 days at networksolutions.com, the domain will be available to register. If the domain name is not purchased within 4 days, it will be released back to the registry and will be generally available for registration.
This protection measure provides our customers the opportunity to register domains they have previously searched without the fear that the name will be already taken through Front Running.
~Jonathon Nevett, Vice President of Policy at Network Solutions
The problem is that what they call a protection measure holds names hostage. Sure, no one will buy the name out from under you, but you are forced to pay Network Solutions premium price (almost 400% of average price) to get the name while they have it blacked out. A search for a name at a different domain registrar would show it as unavailable while the Network Solutions reservation is in place.
Network Solutions has responded to the wide criticism of this new domain front-running policy, but this is a gigantic disappointment to webmasters and the Network Solutions wiki has a well-sourced new section detailing the event.
CNet News.com reported last night that the latest public statement is that Network Solutions is “making improvements to our protection measure.” The changes mean that the names will still be reserved for 4 days, but the pages will no longer resolve to a sales pitch to “buy this now here for far too much money” like they have since the change was made this week. Now, an under construction page will be shown like you can see at http://www.networksolutionssucksmonkeyballs.com/.

Domain Jamming vs Domain Tasting
There exists an Add Grace Period (AGP) that all ICANN-accredited registrars must offer to domain purchasers. AGP is a 5 day grace period that means if you buy a domain that you decide you do not want you can get your money back. This rule is abused by some webmasters as a mechanism to evaluate a domain’s existing or natural traffic via a page full of ads. If the domain taster likes the pennies he makes within the first five days, he keeps it. If the taste was sour, the taster simply gets his money back via AGP.
What Network Solutions has done is created a mechanism that anyone can use to block domain registrations (or at least affordable ones) by searching for a domain and thus locking it into a Network Solutions only purchase option, 4 days at a time. A coworker has asked me, “Well, you can just wait four days for it to be released, right?” Sure can. Anyone can, including the person that jammed the registration in the first place.
The same coworker then said to me, “So, I could write a program that searched for a domain name every other day on Network Solutions and ruin the chances of that name being bought?” Sort of. If the name is purchased at the Network Solutions price it can still be registered, but only silly people register domains at Network Solutions, especially this week. The effect of such a campaign would be Network Solutions profits on the sale because the jammed domain can not be purchased anywhere else.
Comments
The hardest part of my job is to break some of the traditional thinking that dealers want to bring online. The car industry is traditional by nature; new flavors of the same cars arrive annually, dealerships are branded with family names, and the jingle-based commercial is a dealership classic. I will never forget the jingle that Century 3 Chevrolet of Pittsburgh uses in their commercials. Ever. Really, it has been more than 5 years since I have lived within their reach.
I prefer not to wrap text around a picture of a wheel. I do not think that drawing an ugly “burst” around words will make a message more effective. Instead, I very much like to guide the reader’s attention from the top left corner downward. I see no reason to disorganize a page to the degree that a message needs to jump out at the reader in order to grab their attention. Websites are advertisements, but to design them like ads severely dilutes their effectiveness.
Search engine marketing is not paid search. Why this is not obvious is beyond me. Marketing does not equal “buying ads,” so how could something something marketing mean buying ads on something something? I expect a trade publication to conduct the small amount of research required to ensure they are not fabricating definitions and misleading their readers.
His statement only makes sense after you have learned the bogus definition of SEM. I do not think that Mark is an idiot, and it is obvious (to me) that he is talking about pay-per-click advertising costs. It is unfortunate that he has been quoted saying something goofy like dealers are not trying to increase their traffic from search engines, but is that the worst part? I think the largest oops here is the fact that the writer of this article, Jim Leman, took his quote and multiplied the mistake, and none of the editors of the magazine knew better to sort it out. 








