<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO will take ages if you are lazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/search-engines/lazy-seo-will-take-ages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/search-engines/lazy-seo-will-take-ages/</link>
	<description>Web Development Observations and Asides by Corey Salzano</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:58:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/search-engines/lazy-seo-will-take-ages/comment-page-1/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/?p=303#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>I really enjoy when website and search engine relationships like this one are discussed. With the help of Mike and Paul&#039;s writings this week, some readers of these websites have a chance to observe and draw their own conclusions. I honestly do not feel this is insulting or even about specific people so much.
&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
Hi Jeff. As usual, I enjoy your insight. I agree with everything you have stated. You question the time, money and what else is required to reach the eyes of searching shoppers. To expand on your thought experiment about resources--Pay per click ads on search engines may be more affordable or accessible (than optimization) to a business owner in the position of buying one or both (in-house or otherwise). I feel buying traffic &lt;b&gt;should&lt;/b&gt; be cheaper than buying traffic growth. If a dealer&#039;s short term goal can be satisfied &lt;b&gt;only&lt;/b&gt; with a pay-per-visitor advertising program, the magnitude of this ad spend is directly related to the lack of the website&#039;s ability to attract the desired traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoy when website and search engine relationships like this one are discussed. With the help of Mike and Paul&#8217;s writings this week, some readers of these websites have a chance to observe and draw their own conclusions. I honestly do not feel this is insulting or even about specific people so much.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Hi Jeff. As usual, I enjoy your insight. I agree with everything you have stated. You question the time, money and what else is required to reach the eyes of searching shoppers. To expand on your thought experiment about resources&#8211;Pay per click ads on search engines may be more affordable or accessible (than optimization) to a business owner in the position of buying one or both (in-house or otherwise). I feel buying traffic <b>should</b> be cheaper than buying traffic growth. If a dealer&#8217;s short term goal can be satisfied <b>only</b> with a pay-per-visitor advertising program, the magnitude of this ad spend is directly related to the lack of the website&#8217;s ability to attract the desired traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kershner</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/search-engines/lazy-seo-will-take-ages/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Kershner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/?p=303#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>Corey, thanks for the mention in the article. I always enjoy reading your opinions.

You are right, if you know SEO you can get to the top of the SERPS quickly just as Paul has demonstrated. However, it would be more difficult to do this for several keyword or keyword phrases at one time (unless you had the money and resources ) if a dealer was to run a short term promotion. 

What about dealers that do not have a Paul or the resources for truly effective SEO? Not to mention a dealer website platform that is SEO friendly. 

Believe me, I totally agree that dealers have and will continue to overlook the importance and value of SEO. This is what made me say &quot;a great win for dealers&quot;. Having the ability to display relevant inventory on the first page of a google search could help the dealers that do not have a strong SEO presence. These could be the same dealers that are also paying big $$ for other listing services. 

Thanks again Corey for an interesting post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey, thanks for the mention in the article. I always enjoy reading your opinions.</p>
<p>You are right, if you know SEO you can get to the top of the SERPS quickly just as Paul has demonstrated. However, it would be more difficult to do this for several keyword or keyword phrases at one time (unless you had the money and resources ) if a dealer was to run a short term promotion. </p>
<p>What about dealers that do not have a Paul or the resources for truly effective SEO? Not to mention a dealer website platform that is SEO friendly. </p>
<p>Believe me, I totally agree that dealers have and will continue to overlook the importance and value of SEO. This is what made me say &#8220;a great win for dealers&#8221;. Having the ability to display relevant inventory on the first page of a google search could help the dealers that do not have a strong SEO presence. These could be the same dealers that are also paying big $$ for other listing services. </p>
<p>Thanks again Corey for an interesting post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/search-engines/lazy-seo-will-take-ages/comment-page-1/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/?p=303#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>Jared, I just noticed you dropped the trackback to this post on the article I am discussing on your site, drivingsales. Take your ball and go home, why don&#039;t you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared, I just noticed you dropped the trackback to this post on the article I am discussing on your site, drivingsales. Take your ball and go home, why don&#8217;t you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/search-engines/lazy-seo-will-take-ages/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/?p=303#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>Jared, thanks for your comments. I don&#039;t feel that I am insulting Mike, and (probably since I wrote it), I don&#039;t feel that this post is misguided.
&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
I have linked to Mike&#039;s writing and comments twice already, so I also don&#039;t agree that I am distorting the context. Anyone could click the links above to find the drivingsales location that you linked again here in the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared, thanks for your comments. I don&#8217;t feel that I am insulting Mike, and (probably since I wrote it), I don&#8217;t feel that this post is misguided.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I have linked to Mike&#8217;s writing and comments twice already, so I also don&#8217;t agree that I am distorting the context. Anyone could click the links above to find the drivingsales location that you linked again here in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/search-engines/lazy-seo-will-take-ages/comment-page-1/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/?p=303#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>It appears that the objective of this post was taken way out of context.  Mike&#039;s blog, where you took his comment from, was written about things to look for when selecting a PPC vendor. His post did not at all talk about how SEO is better or worse than SEM.

Your proof of it taking 4 hours to rank for a word does prove that you are a skilled SEO engineer.  It does prove that words can be ranked for quickly.  However, it should not be thrown out as an insult to Mike. As you can tell by reading the full context of his words, his point was that PPC is nimble, and quicker (particularly for most car dealers since that was the audience he was talking too).  

The fact that it took you 4 hours to rank for a word that that could be purchased in 4 minutes doesn&#039;t prove Mike was off note.

I think this post is mis-guided.  Most agree that both a PPC and SEO campaign are best when tied together.  I know Mike is a huge advocate of both, as evidenced by his writings.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to diminish that.  On the flip side, Paul you did an incredible job of organically ranking for a word very fast, I believe even mike would call that commendable.

You can see mikes full post here:

http://www.drivingsales.com/blog/dealerdotcom/2008/12/09/choosing-your-ppc-vendor-will-you-have-control/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the objective of this post was taken way out of context.  Mike&#8217;s blog, where you took his comment from, was written about things to look for when selecting a PPC vendor. His post did not at all talk about how SEO is better or worse than SEM.</p>
<p>Your proof of it taking 4 hours to rank for a word does prove that you are a skilled SEO engineer.  It does prove that words can be ranked for quickly.  However, it should not be thrown out as an insult to Mike. As you can tell by reading the full context of his words, his point was that PPC is nimble, and quicker (particularly for most car dealers since that was the audience he was talking too).  </p>
<p>The fact that it took you 4 hours to rank for a word that that could be purchased in 4 minutes doesn&#8217;t prove Mike was off note.</p>
<p>I think this post is mis-guided.  Most agree that both a PPC and SEO campaign are best when tied together.  I know Mike is a huge advocate of both, as evidenced by his writings.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to diminish that.  On the flip side, Paul you did an incredible job of organically ranking for a word very fast, I believe even mike would call that commendable.</p>
<p>You can see mikes full post here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drivingsales.com/blog/dealerdotcom/2008/12/09/choosing-your-ppc-vendor-will-you-have-control/" rel="nofollow">http://www.drivingsales.com/blog/dealerdotcom/2008/12/09/choosing-your-ppc-vendor-will-you-have-control/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rushing</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/search-engines/lazy-seo-will-take-ages/comment-page-1/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rushing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticaltechnique.com/?p=303#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>Another thing that many PPC fans will not mention if they know is the demographic of the &quot;Heavy Clickers&quot;

That medium is probably best reserved for chasing credit leads or building a list for giveaway promotions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing that many PPC fans will not mention if they know is the demographic of the &#8220;Heavy Clickers&#8221;</p>
<p>That medium is probably best reserved for chasing credit leads or building a list for giveaway promotions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
